Agent Sightings Real agent use cases

Home › Comparisons › n8n vs Make vs Zapier for AI agents

n8n vs Make vs Zapier for AI agents

Three automation tools walk into a bar and each charges for the drinks in a different unit. I read the pricing pages so you don't have to, and I only kept the facts I could link to. Prices change, so every row says where it came from and when I looked.

n8nMakeZapier
What you are billed forOne workflow execution, however many steps it has sourceCredits; most module actions cost one credit sourceTasks: each successful action. Triggers and built-in tools are free source
Self-hostingYes. Community Edition is free to self-host; you pay for infrastructure sourceNo. Cloud only sourceNo. Cloud only source
LicenceSustainable Use License: fair-code, not OSI open source. You may not host it as a service where clients build workflows sourceProprietary SaaS sourceProprietary SaaS source
Free tier (as listed on codetoolpilot.com)No free cloud plan (trial); free self-hosted edition source1,000 credits a month source100 tasks a month source
AI building blocks (same source)AI Agent node, MCP server trigger and client sourceMake AI Agents (listed as open beta), MCP server sourceAI by Zapier steps, Agents, Chatbots, MCP source

Every cell links to where I read it. Facts checked 29 Oct 2026. Prices and plans change quickly; confirm on the vendor's site before you spend anything.

How to read this

What people actually did with them

n8n: 40 cases here

Make: 10 cases here

Zapier: 8 cases here

Visit n8n · Visit Make · Visit Zapier

No affiliate links here. If that ever changes, I will say so on this page.